Ismaila Mustapha, popularly known as Mompha, has fiercely criticized the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), labeling it as a corrupt and ineffective government agency. This condemnation follows the EFCC’s revelation that a colossal N35 billion was found in bank accounts linked to him.

Mompha’s critique emerged in response to a recent court proceeding where a prosecution witness, Idi Musa, an EFCC investigator, testified about the discovery of the substantial funds. The EFCC’s ongoing trial against Mompha, who faces charges of money laundering along with his company, Ismalob Global Investment Limited, has been a subject of public interest since it began in January 2022.

During the court session on July 1, 2024, Musa detailed how the EFCC traced the N35 billion to two bank accounts associated with Mompha. The testimony, delivered to Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court in Ikeja, Lagos, added a new dimension to the high-profile case. The EFCC had previously arraigned Mompha and his company on an eight-count charge, which includes conspiracy to launder funds obtained through unlawful activities, retaining proceeds of criminal conduct, and failing to disclose assets and property.

In a vehement response, Mompha dismissed the EFCC’s allegations, accusing the agency of being a “useless” entity driven by corruption. He has consistently maintained his innocence, arguing that the charges are baseless and that the EFCC is targeting him unfairly. Mompha’s criticism reflects a broader sentiment among some Nigerian citizens who believe that the EFCC often engages in selective justice and lacks transparency in its operations.

Mompha’s legal troubles with the EFCC are not new. His initial arrest in 2019 made headlines, and he was charged with laundering N33 billion. Despite the serious allegations, Mompha was granted bail, but his movements have since been restricted, with his trial closely monitored by both the media and the public.

The EFCC, established in 2003 to combat financial crimes in Nigeria, has faced its own share of criticism. Accusations of corruption within the agency and inefficacy in handling high-profile cases have occasionally marred its reputation. Critics argue that while the EFCC has made some notable arrests, its prosecution success rate remains relatively low.

The Mompha case highlights broader issues of financial crime and justice in Nigeria. Money laundering remains a significant challenge in the country, with illicit financial flows estimated to cost Nigeria billions of dollars annually. The government’s efforts to clamp down on these activities through agencies like the EFCC are crucial, but effectiveness and integrity are often questioned.

For the EFCC, high-profile cases like Mompha’s are opportunities to demonstrate its commitment to fighting corruption. However, these cases also test the agency’s ability to conduct thorough investigations and secure convictions. The ongoing trial, with its dramatic accusations and substantial sums of money involved, underscores the complexity and high stakes of Nigeria’s battle against financial crime.

As Mompha’s trial progresses, the court’s findings and the EFCC’s handling of the case will be closely watched. The outcome may influence public perception of the EFCC and its role in curbing financial crimes in Nigeria. For now, Mompha’s sharp rebuke of the agency adds a contentious layer to a legal saga that has captivated national attention.