Kola Ologbondiyan, the former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has firmly stated that true reconciliation within the party is contingent upon the acting National Chairman, Umar Damagum, stepping back into his former role as Deputy National Chairman for the North.
Ologbondiyan emphasized that any reconciliation efforts will only be fruitful if justice prevails, which he believes necessitates the North Central region being allowed to appoint a new national chairman for the party.
During an interview, Ologbondiyan urged the reconciliation committee, led by Olagunsoye Oyinlola, to courageously address the situation surrounding Damagum’s current position.
He remarked, “The committee must have the fortitude to remind Damagum that his rightful place is as Deputy National Chairman for the North, and it’s important to clarify that no one is demanding his removal from that role.”
He further articulated, “For reconciliation to take root and last, there must be fairness, which includes permitting the North Central to nominate a successor to Dr. Iyorchia Ayu. While reconciliation is essential, it must originate from the National Chairman’s office. Attempting to reconcile without addressing the leadership conflict is counterproductive.”
Addressing the disciplinary committee, Ologbondiyan asserted that Damagum should be the first individual summoned for scrutiny due to his alleged biases in the ongoing Rivers State conflict. He stated, “While the committees have their merits, Damagum must also hold himself accountable and appear before them, given the controversies surrounding his leadership.”
He noted that Damagum had previously alluded to having rivals within the party, suggesting a need for his own reconciliation. Ologbondiyan pointed out, “As the acting Chairman, he is expected to remain neutral on issues. However, his claim that no one can intimidate him indicates he perceives threats from within.”
He concluded by highlighting the contradiction in Damagum’s leadership, pointing out that if the party maintains that those who departed have vacated their positions, then taking sides in disputes—such as those involving court matters—suggests a clear bias.
